In a world where science often finds itself at odds with politics, a heartfelt letter from EPA employees has emerged, shedding light on their commitment to truth and the environment. This enlightening correspondence reveals the unwavering passion of hundreds dedicated to protecting our planet for future generations.

In a powerful act of dissent, over 200 current and former employees of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) came together to voice their concerns about the organization’s direction. Their letter bravely accused EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin of undermining the agency’s foundational mission to ensure clean air and water for all. This collective outcry painted a vivid picture of dedicated scientists and staff frustrated by a shift away from scientific consensus toward policies favoring polluters.

“Our decisions should be grounded in rigorous, peer-reviewed research,” the employees wrote, emphasizing the necessity of science in shaping policy. They expressed deep worry that current actions not only threaten American public health but also compromise scientific integrity worldwide, calling for a rejection of any politicized agendas.

Among the letter’s striking points was a plea to recognize the growing politicization of the agency. The authors highlighted the agency’s communications as increasingly laden with misinformation, straying far from its primary duty of safeguarding human health and the environment. The letter even referred to some of Zeldin’s messages as resembling “religious” fervor, pushing a particular agenda rather than upholding scientific integrity.

Zeldin’s tenure has seen a notable shift in the EPA’s priorities, with a focus on deregulation that promises immediate benefits for fossil fuel industries. As he proudly announced new policies aimed at overturning environmental protections, he declared it “the greatest day of deregulation” in the nation’s history. Such statements, however, left many in the agency feeling a mix of alarm and frustration.

The letter also described an environment where fear stifles honest communication, with many signers opting to remain anonymous due to concerns over potential repercussions. This sense of dread resonated deeply, especially following similar expressions of discontent from other scientific bodies, including staff members at the National Institutes of Health.

As the employees continue their fight to uphold scientific integrity, their heartfelt letter serves not just as a call to action, but as a beacon of hope. In a time of uncertainty, it emphasizes the importance of collective voices advocating for a sustainable future—one where science prevails, and the vital mission of environmental protection takes center stage.

© 2025 AFP